The press conference has changing. It has become a form of ‘event marketing’ and it is no longer restricted to selected journalists (and bloggers). They have to be invited of course otherwise it wouldn’t be a press conference but they are no longer the exclusive channel for the launch message. We can all attend the launch.
This change has already taken place in the technology sector with two major examples in the past week. Apple, who have mastered the craft of the press conference event, launched the iPad, and today Google launched its new killer social networking application Google Buzz.
For me what was extraordinary about the launch of Buzz was that this morning I didn’t know it was about to happen. I picked up the buzz around ‘Buzz’ on twitter. I saw that the press conference was going to be channelled live on YouTube so I joined Jeremiah Owyang and the select few who were actually there and tuned in. I realised immediately that Buzz would be big so I ‘live blogged’ over at PR Media Blog whilst the conference was still on, screen grabbed an image from the YouTube feed and posted my take a couple of minutes before the conference ended.
I subsequently discovered via @scobliezer that meant I had broken the embargo that the journalists attending had signed up to. Surely, they broke their own embargo?
Companies and brands spend millions on creativity and airtime to secure the audience and all round PR value of a TV advertising spot during the Super Bowl. In fact it was a tech company that created the craze for high concept ads in the breaks during transmission. In 1984 Apple introduced the Macintosh to the world during the Super Bowl with an ad directed by Ridley Scott.


As PR communicators we need to be very careful about content. PR people have a tendency to feel that if something is published then our goals have been achieved. The ease with which things can now be published undermines that presumption. The sheer volume of web content means that a lot of the stuff that appears on the net is of little interest to anyone other than the publisher. That which has no interest will have no impact.
We are moving away from a world where content and products were pushed to a world in which content and products are pulled. There are many reasons for this and they are all interlinked. The decline of deference means that the consumer is less willing to accept what is being pushed. In the digital landscape it is easy and quick to tailor content to consumer demand. Even in manufacturing and production we are seeing an increasing number of bespoke processes and offers.



